Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5997 (AP)

N. Lakshmi Tirupathamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/3196/2020 · 2025-09-11

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010053772020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 3196/2020 Between: 1. N.LAKSHMI TIRUPATHAMMA, D/O.SESHAGIRI RAO, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC-VOLUNTEER, R/O.PENUGANCHIPROLU VILLAGE ANDMANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, COMMISSIONERATE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA II TOWN POLICE STATION, KOTHAPETA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not conducting the proper investigation of the case as illegal, arbitrary, contrary and consequently direct the respondents to send the petitioner to Magistrate for the purpose of recording the statement, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P ADITYA HARSHA VARDHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue any order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not conducting the proper investigation of the case as illegal, arbitrary, contrary and consequently direct the respondents to send the petitioner to Magistrate for the purpose of recording the statement, pending disposal of the writ petition ...” At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. In that view, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 3196 of 2020 12.09.2025 Mjl /*