Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59963 (CHH)

LOCHAN KULDEEP v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/13192/2025 · 2025-11-23

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:56874 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13192 of 2025 1 - Lochan Kuldeep S/o Gend Das Kuldeep Aged About 77 Years Retired Assistant, R/o Village And Post R. Jaamgaon, Tehsil Patan, District Durg C.G. 2 - Nandu Ram S/o Sukman Soi Aged About 73 Years Retired Labour, R/o Village Anjani, Post Patoud, Tehsil And District Kanker C.G. 3 - Kartik Ram S/o Sahdev Markam Aged About 69 Years Retired Labour, R/o Village Dhanora, Post Sarwandi, Tehsil Narharpur, District Kanker C.G. 4 - Manbodhi Ram S/o Suberam Markam Aged About 63 Years Retired Labour, R/o Village Salhetola, Post Saarwandi, Tehsil Narharpur, District Kanker C.G. 5 - Desi Ram S/o Rajau Ram Salaam Aged About 76 Years Retired Labour, R/o Village Daldali, Post Sarona, Tehsil Narharpur, District Kanker C.G. ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resource Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Engineer In Chief, Water Resource Department Shivnath Mandal, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 3 - Chief Engineer, Mahanadi Jalasay Pariyojana Department Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 4 - Executive Engineer, Water Management Division Rudri Code No. 38 Tehsil And District Dhamtari C.G. 5 - Sub Divisional Officer, Water Management Division No. 10 Dudhawa, District Kanker C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Swapnil Keshari, Advocate For State : Mrs. Smita Jha, Panel Lawyer BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.11.24 17:38:47 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 24.11.2025 1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022)]. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika