1 2025:CGHC:58466 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7767 of 2023 1 - Lalit Tirkey S/o Late Shri Marshal Tirkey Aged About 56 Years Sahayak Upnirikshak/kary. N.T.P.C. Sipat, Mansik Aswastha Dwara Smt. Nilkushum Tirkey Pati Shri Lalit Tirkey Niwasi Ujjawal Nagar Township Qtr. No. 165/b, N.T.P.C. Sipat, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Director General Central Industrial Security Force Headquarter Block Kendriya Audhyogik Surakshabal Mukhyalay Block No. 13, C.G.O. Complex Lodhiroad Nayi Delhi. 2 - Mahanirikshak Kendirya Audyogik Suraksha Madhyakshetra Mukhyalay Sipta Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Up-Mahanirikshak Kendriya Audyogik Surakshabal Sipat Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Commandant Kendriya Audyogik Surakshabal Ekai Sipat Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Up-Commandant Kendriya Audyogik Surakshabal Ekai Sipat Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Moin Khan, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhupendra Pandey, CGC. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 02/12/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 यह कि उ्ቈरवा दीगण किदीकित किय जा वा कि वा य कि से स्वास्थ ह ቝኌस्थकित ेሰ अधि तेሰ र घन्टे ह ቐ኏%टे ेሴ। 10.2 यह कि उ्ቈरवा दीगण किदीकित किय जा वा कि वा य कि त ( कियेሰ )से र किकित्से अवा वात सेकिहत दी अकिवाेሴ+ब य(वा ह ्ቈ र। 10.3 यह कि उ्ቈरवा दीगण किदीकित किय जा वा कि य कि स्वा स्थ्य दीखत ह0य उसे किसे ्ቚ र त वा प्ቔ जा र र एवा+ य कि कियेሰ )से र से ቎ኋ किह अवा दीवा। 10.4 यह कि, अन्य अ)तष जा ेሰ य न्य य ेሴय उकित सेेሰझे उ्ቈरवा दीगण से य कि किदीेሴ य जा वा।” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is presently suffering from a severe medical ailment, which has 3 substantially impaired his physical capacity to perform the standard eight-hour duty mandated by his employment. It is contended that, owing to his fragile health condition, the petitioner is unable to discharge prolonged duties without risking further deterioration of his wellbeing. Counsel further submits that, through the present petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the competent authority to consider his case with due sympathy and humanitarian consideration, and to permit him to render services for a reduced duration, not exceeding eight hours, until such time as he fully recovers from his ailment and is medically fit to resume regular duties. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner is first required to submit an appropriate and duly detailed representation before the competent authority, so that the authority may properly examine his grievances in accordance with law and take a reasoned decision; therefore, without such representation having been made and considered, the present petition is premature and not maintainable. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, and taking into account the submissions made by the parties, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner to submit a comprehensive and duly supported representation before the 4 competent authority, enclosing all relevant documents necessary for proper adjudication; and, in turn, the concerned authority shall consider and decide such representation strictly in accordance with law, within a reasonable period, by passing a well-reasoned and speaking order. 6. It is hereby clarified that this Court has not expressed or formed any opinion on the merits of the case at this stage. 7. With this observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat