ANILBHAI RAMBHAI PATEL v. PRAKASHBHAI PRAHLADBHAI PATEL (GAMI)
SCA/13594/2024 · 2025-08-26
Maulik J Shelat
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5996 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5996 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13594 of 2024 ========================================================== ANILBHAI RAMBHAI PATEL Versus PRAKASHBHAI PRAHLADBHAI PATEL (GAMI) & ORS. ========================================================== Appearance: MR DARSHAN B GANDHI(9771) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 DS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT
Date : 26/08/2025
ORAL ORDER Learned advocate Mr.Darshan B. Gandhi appearing for the petitioner states that out of 3 respondents, two have been served but one still to be served with the notice and due to such reason, direct service affidavit could not have been filed within time granted by this Court. Nonetheless, the fact remains that as per the last order passed by this Court dated 14.08.2025, which reads as under:-
“When the matter was called out none present for petitioner, it appears that Direct Service affidavit is not filed which may be filed before the next date of hearing failing to which present writ application stands dismissed. Stand over to 26.08.2025. Listed on top of the board.” So in view of the above, the present writ application stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Liberty reserved in favour p. 2 of the petitioner to file appropriate application seeking restoration of the application when the service affidavit is ready to be filed in the matter.
(MAULIK J.SHELAT,J) MOHD MONIS