Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5994 (ALL)

NAURANGI LAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

A483/109/2025 · 2025-02-23

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:26343 Court No. - 82 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 109 of 2025 Applicant :- Naurangi Lal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the S.T. No. 54 of 2017, arising out of case crime no. 408 of 2016, under Sections 302, 147, 148, 149, 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Iglas, District Aligarh, pending in the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge, Court No.6, Aligarh expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the informant in the said session trial and same is pending since 2016. It is also submitted that the opposite party nos.2 to 6 are not cooperating with the Court concerned and are adopting delaying tactics in disposal of the said session trial and only dates are being fixed in the matter. Charges have been framed in the matter. It is also submitted that only evidence of PW- 1/informant has been recorded so far and the case is at the stage of recording the evidence of other witnesses. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said session trial. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. It reveals from the perusal of the order sheets that the said S.T. is pending since the year 2016 and the same is at the stage of recording of the evidence of witnesses. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to make all endeavours for expeditious disposal of the case, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 24.2.2025 safi Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad