IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58370 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-396 Year-2023 Thana- KARJA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Om Prakash Kumar son of Dinbandhu Rai @ Dinbandhu Ray Village- Jiyan Kurd Ps- Karja Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Soni Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rita Verma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 2 17-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Karja P.S Case No. 396 of 2023 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 379 and 506 of the I.P.C. 3. As per allegation in the FIR, it is alleged that petitioner has assaulted the head of the Surendra Sah by means of knife due to which he suffered a cut wound and also snatched case of Rs. 2,000/- from the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent except this case. He also Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58370 of 2024(2) dt.17-01-2025 2/2 submits that petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence. He has been falsely been implicated in this case. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 6. From perusal of the F.I.R., impugned order and case diary, it appears that there is sharp cut injury on the leaft perietal region of skull on which six stitches were applied. Thereafter, doctor has also mentioned nature of injury is dangerous. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of injury and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 8. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. Mayank/- (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U T