Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 223 CWP-17369-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision :17.07.2025 Sukhvinder Singh Thind
...Petitioner
Versus State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Rampal, Addl. A.G. Punjab. Mr. H.S. Saggu, Advocate for respondents No.3 & 4. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the private respondents were further promoted and there is no prayer for further promotion in the present petition, hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to file a fresh one with better particular even by claiming the benefit of further promotion to the post of Registrar with effect from the date persons junior in the cadre of Superintendent Grade-I were promoted.
2. Ordered accordingly. July 17, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) aarti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.07.18 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document