Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5990 (JHR)

ABDUL RASHID ALIAS GOLDY ALIAS A. RASHID v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1336/2025 · 2025-02-27

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1336 of 2025 ------ Abdul Rashid @ Goldy @ A. Rashid, aged about 39 years, son of Haroon Rashid, Resident of 64 Road No.9, Jawahar Nagar, Mango, near Imam Bara, Azadnagar, P.O. & P.S.-Azadnagar, Town- Jamshedpur, Dist.-East-Singhbhum, Jamshedpur .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. R. S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mrs. J. S. Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate ------ Order No.02 Dated- 27-02-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Sitaram Dera P.S. Case No.168 of 2024 instituted under Sections 329(3), 191(2), 191(3), 190 and 109 of the B.N.S, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that petitioner being the member of an unlawful assembly entered into the premises of the informant and attempted to murder him by firing. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R., he has been implicated only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused persons. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-16 of the instant anticipatory bail application, learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and he undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant, in any manner during pendency of the case hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Sitaram Dera P.S. Case No.168 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant, in any manner during pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/