Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59885 (BOM)

BABAN NAGNATH CHAVAN v. DR. PRAKASH MANSUKHLAL BHANDARI

WP/1564/2019 · 2025-11-11

Shri Sushil M Ghodeswar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 call paper criwp1563.19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1563 OF 2019 BABAN NAGNATH CHAVAN VERSUS AJAY RAJABAPU LANDGHULE AND 908 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1564 OF 2019 BABAN NAGNATH CHAVAN VERSUS DR. PRAKASH MANSUKHLAL BHANDARI AND 909 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1565 OF 2019 BABAN NAGNATH CHAVAN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for the petitioners : Mr. K.B. Borde APP for the Respondents-State : Mr. S.B. Jadhav ... ( CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ) DATE : 21 NOVEMBER, 2025 PER COURT : 1. A motion is moved by way of speaking to minutes in the above Writ Petitions. 2. In order dated 11.11.2025, the name of the learned APP “Mr. S.B. Jadhav for Respondents-State” is inadvertently remained to be mentioned in the appearance of the Advocates. 3. Therefore, the name of “Mr. S.B. Jadhav, as the learned APP for the Respondents-State” be mentioned in the appearance of the aforesaid order dated 11.11.2025. 4. The motion is disposed of. 5. The corrected order be uploaded. ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) mahajansb/ 2025:BHC-AUG:30846 2 call paper criwp1563.19 This order is corrected as per the speaking to minutes order dated 21.11.2025. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1563 OF 2019 BABAN NAGNATH CHAVAN VERSUS AJAY RAJABAPU LANDGHULE AND 908 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1564 OF 2019 BABAN NAGNATH CHAVAN VERSUS DR. PRAKASH MANSUKHLAL BHANDARI AND 909 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1565 OF 2019 BABAN NAGNATH CHAVAN VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER Mr.K.B.Borde, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.B. Jadhav, APP for the Respondents-State ( CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ) DATE : 11 NOVEMBER, 2025 PER COURT : 1. The learned Advocate for the petitioners, at the outset, submits that due to passage of time, the matters have become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of, as infructuous. ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) khs/