- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:18178 WP No. 101198 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 101198 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. RAJESAB S/O. YAMANAPPA PINAR, AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: MUDDAPUR VILLAGE, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGAKOT, PIN CODE: 587 122. 2. NURAJAN W/O. YAMANAPPA PINJAR, AGE: 46 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: MUDDAPUR VILLAGE, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGAKOT, PIN CODE: 587 122. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P. N. HOSAMANE, ADVOCATE) AND: BAJAJ HOUSING FINANCE LTD., (BHGFL), A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT MUMBAI - PUNE ROAD, AKURDI, PUNE – 411 035, BRANCH OFFICE AT BAGALKOTE, R/BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, BAPUGOUDA SHANKARGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 43 YEARS, WORKING AS REGIONAL COLLECTION MANAGER. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ANOOP G. DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 07-01-2025, PASSED BY PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, BAGALKOT IN CRI. MISC. NO.03/2025, VIDE ANNEXURE-A. B. ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING NOTICE DATED 27-1-2025, ISSUED BY RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE-D AND ETC., Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:18178 WP No. 101198 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking the following prayer: A. Issue writ of Certiorari quashing impugned order dated 07-01-2025, passed by Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Bagalkot in Cri. Misc. No.03/2025, vide Annexure-A. B. Issue writ of Certiorari quashing Notice dated 27-1- 2025, issued by respondent as per Annexure-D. C. Grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to serve the ends of justice and equity. 2. The petitioners are the borrowers and they have repaid the entire amount. What is left in due, are the additional charges that the Finance Company has imposed. The petitioners submit that they have rendered a representation to the respondent-Finance Company and the same is assured to be considered by the respondent. The said representation has been forwarded to the Head Office at Mumbai is what is indicated. 3. In the light of the said circumstance, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it would suffice for the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:18178 WP No. 101198 of 2025 present, if a direction is issued to the respondent to consider the said representation and pass necessary orders. 4. In the light of the aforesaid circumstance, I deem it appropriate to dispose the petition with a direction to the respondent to consider the representation and pass necessary orders thereon in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE KGK/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 99