Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59876 (CHH)

Lalak Prasad Yadav v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/13224/2025 · 2025-11-23

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:56873 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13224 of 2025 1 - Lalak Prasad Yadav S/o Jagannath Yadav Aged About 66 Years Retired From Thermal Power Pariyojna Ambikapur, R/o Muhalla Kenabandh Ward No. 21, Post Ambikapur, Distt. Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Indarpal Yadav S/o Late Balwant Yadav Aged About 67 Years Retired Time Keeper, R/o House No. 158, Main Road Jhingo, Balrampur, Distt. Balrampur- Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Brijmohan Lal Verma S/o Surajddin Verma Aged About 66 Years Retired Chowkidar, R/o Paratappur Road Kathha, In Front Of Factory Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resource Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Engineer In Chief Water Resource Department Shivnath Mandal, North Block, Sector 19, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chief Engineer Hasdev Ganga Kachhar Water Resource Division Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgrh. 4 - Executive Engineer Water Resource Division Balrampur, Distt. Balrampur Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Executive Engineer Water Resource Division No. 1, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Executive Engineer Water Resource Division Manendragarh, Distt. Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Swapnil Keshari, Advocate For State : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.11.24 17:38:46 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 24.11.2025 1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022)]. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika