HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 153/2013 Murlidhar Rao M D Fabricon P Ltd ----Appellant Versus M D R S R T C Jaipur And Others ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2788/2005 R S R T C ----Appellant Versus M/s Fabricom Pvt Ltd ----Respondent S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 42/2006 Murlidhar ----Appellant Versus Managing Director, R S R T C J ----Respondent S.B. Civil Review Petition No. 18/2009 Managind Directore R S R T ----Appellant Versus Murlildhar Rao Febricon Pvt Ltd ----Respondent S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 5786/2011 R S R T C ----Appellant Versus M/s Fabricom Pvt Ltd And Ors ----Respondent S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 154/2013 Murlidhar Rao M D Fabricon P Ltd ----Appellant Versus M D R S R T C Jaipur And Others ----Respondent S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 155/2013 Murlidhar Rao M D Fabricon P Ltd (2 of 2) [CMA-153/2013] ----Appellant Versus M D R S R T C Jaipur And Others ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. R.K. Daga with Mr. Rahul Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.K. Singhi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Judgment / Order 26/08/2025 S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 42/2006:- Heard on application (No.1/2023) for converting the revision petition into civil misc. appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Office to proceed further. S.B. Civil Review Petition No. 18/2009:- Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he does not want any relief against respondent No.2. So, service of notice upon respondent No.2 may be dispensed with. In view of the above, service of notice upon respondent No.2 is dispensed with at the risk and cost of the appellants. List these appeals on 09.09.2025. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J Gaurav/74-80