Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5986 (JK)

AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, SRINAGAR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT v. M/S MIR HANDICRAFTS PVT LTD AND ORS

LPA/9/2025 · 2025-05-13

Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sr. No.1 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR LPA 9/2025 in[WP(C) 41/2022] AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, SRINAGAR INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ...APPELLANT(S) Through: - Mr. T.M. Shamsi, DSGI Mr. Digvijay Rai, Advocate through V.C. Mr. Faizan Ahmad Ganie, CGC Vs. MS/ MIR HANDICRAFTS PVT. LTD AND ORS. …RESPONDENT(S) Through:- Mr. Mian Tufail,, Advocate Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy. AG with Ms. Nowbahar Khan, Assisting Counsel Mr. Vikas Malik, Advocate with Ms. Areeba Ahad, Advocate and Mr. Hamzah Draboo, Advocate for R-5. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 13.05.2025 1. Impugned in this Letters Patent Appeal is the order dated 24th December, 2024, passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in WP(C) No. 41/2022 and other clubbed matters, in case titled “M/S Mir Handicrafts Pvt. Ltd and Ors. VS. Airport Authority of India Srinagar International Airport”, whereby the learned Single Judge has directed the Police Post, Humhama, Budgam, to conduct a preliminary verification into the incident and register an FIR if preliminary verification discloses commission of cognizable offence. MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 14.05.25 2. It has been brought to our notice that WP(C) No. 41/2022 along with other clubbed matters in which the impugned order has been passed, has been heard and reserved for orders. 3. In that view of the matter, the order passed by the learned Single Bench at the interlocutory stage which is impugned before us along with all other orders passed from time to time shall merge with the final judgment that may be passed by the learned Single Bench. 4. In that view of the aforesaid development, this appeal is rendered infructuous and the same is dismissed as such. (SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE JUDGE Srinagar, 13.05.2025 “Mir Arif” MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 14.05.25