Crl.M.P.No.10106 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.517 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23.06.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.M.P.No.10106 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.517 of 2025 Deepak @ Deepa ...Petitioner/Appellant Vs. The State Rep By The Inspector of Police Thally Police Station, Krishnagiri District. Crime No. 170/2016 ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C., to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner/ appellant in judgement made dated passed in 28.04.2025 in S.C.No.30 of 2023 on the file of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Denkanikottai pending disposal of this Appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ezhilarasan For Respondent : Mr.S.Raja Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor Page No.1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.10106 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.517 of 2025 ORDER This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking suspension of sentence imposed by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Denkanikottai, in S.C.No.30 of 2023 dated 28.04.2025, and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above appeal. 2. The petitioner, who is an accused in S.C.No.30 of 2023, was convicted and sentenced by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Denkanikottai, vide judgment dated 28.04.2025, as follows: S.No Conviction under Section Sentence awarded 1. 451 of IPC to undergo 7 years simple imprisonment and fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default to undergo 6 months simple imprisonment 2. 395 read with Section 397 of IPC to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default to undergo 6 months simple imprisonment 3. 342 of IPC to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Page No.2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.10106 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.517 of 2025 S.No Conviction under Section Sentence awarded Rs.5000/-, in default to undergo 6 months simple imprisonment 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent. 4. This Court finds that no prima facie case has been made out for suspension of the sentence since the Trial Court has gone through the evidence in its entirety and also finds that the petitioner had committed very serious and heinous offence. 5. In the result, the petition for suspension of sentence is dismissed. 23.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order sma To Page No.3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.10106 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.517 of 2025 Assistant Sessions Judge, Denkanikottai, Page No.4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.M.P.No.10106 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.517 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. Sma Crl.M.P.No.10106 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.517 of 2025 23.06.2025 Page No.5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis