GURUDIAL SINGH v. STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/28103/2025 · 2025-05-22
Sandeep Moudgil
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59844 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59844 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
135
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28103-2025 DECIDED ON: 22.05.2025 GURUDIAL SINGH
.....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER
.....RESPONDENTS CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Rajeev Anand, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Toor, APP UT, Chandigarh and Mr. Adhiraj Toor, Advocate for UT. Chandigarh.
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) Petition Under Section 528 of BNSS Seeking Quashing Of order dated 20.10.2024 [Annexure P-8] whereby the petitioner herein is summoned to appear in the above-said criminal revision no.6 of 2024 which is instituted with malicious intent to wreak vengeance, regarding which the FIR NO. 380 dated 18.12.2013 Registered At Police Industrial Station: Area Chandigarh, Under Sections 177, 420, 468, 471 IPC AS the said FIR already stands cancelled and also the complaint filed stands dismissed, as continued proceedings are the abuse of process of law and resulting in failure of justice even though the complainant has not locus standi to institute private complaint and not even an aggrieved person and was just an informant in fir which already stands cancelled. MEENU 2025.05.23 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-28103-2025 -2- After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition. Prayer is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 22.05.2025
JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MEENU 2025.05.23 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document