234. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Zora Singh Rajbir Kaur and others CORAM: Present: NAMIT KUMAR 1. 27.04.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib, whereby the appeal was dismissed and the order dated 04. by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fatehgarh Sahib, directing the petitioner to pay Rs.2,000/ month as rent accommodation to respondent No.1 2. N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus Rajbir Kaur and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR None. ----- NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 27.04.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib, whereby the appeal was dismissed and the order dated 04. by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fatehgarh Sahib, directing the petitioner to pay Rs.2,000/- per month as maintenance and Rs.1,000/ month as rent accommodation to respondent No.1 On 04.09.2024, the following order was passed: “As per office report, notice to respondent No. Kaur has been received back unserved with the report that she is not residing at the given address. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to furnish correct/fresh address of respondent No. 02 weeks from today. On his doing so, notice be issued to respondent No.1 for 26.03.2025.” N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-1607-2022 Date of decision: 30.09.2025 .... Petitioner .... Respondents NAMIT KUMAR Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 27.04.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib, whereby the appeal was dismissed and the order dated 04.06.2018 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fatehgarh Sahib, directing the per month as maintenance and Rs.1,000/- per month as rent accommodation to respondent No.1-wife, was affirmed. wing order was passed:- eport, notice to respondent No.1-Rajbir Kaur has been received back unserved with the report that she is not residing at the given address. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to furnish fresh address of respondent No.1, within in a period of On his doing so, notice be issued to respondent No.1 for Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 27.04.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib, 06.2018 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fatehgarh Sahib, directing the per Rajbir Kaur has been received back unserved with the report that she Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to furnish 1, within in a period of On his doing so, notice be issued to respondent No.1 for SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.09.30 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRR-1607-2022 - 2 - Thereafter, on the last date of hearing i.e. 12.05.2025, the following order was passed:- “As per office report, notice could not be issued to respondent No.1 for want of correct address. Let the needful be done within a period of two weeks from today. On doing so, fresh notice be issued to respondent No.1, returnable on 30.09.2025. Copy of this order be forwarded to learned counsel for the petitioner for compliance.” 3. As per office report, notice could not be issued to respondent No.1 for want of correct address. 4. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing and today also, the position is the same. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present petition. 5. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE September 30, 2025 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.09.30 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document