1 / 3 2025:CGHC:56539 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5752 of 2025 Jaimit Lal Kujur S/o Late Shri Premdan Kujur Aged About 38 Years R/o Barjor Kansabel, Jashpur District Jashpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Forest And Climate Change, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar And Vikas) Sahkari Sangh (Vandhan) Bhawan, Sector-24, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Secretary Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar And Vikas) Sahkari Sangh Maryadit Sector-243 Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Conservator Of Forest And Chief General Manager Sarguja Forest Circle Chhattisgarh 5 - Collector Jashpur District Jashpur (C.G.) Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2025.11.24 10:26:36 +0530 2 / 3 6 - Managing Director Zila Vanopaj Union Maryadit Jashpur Nagar, Chhattisgarh 7 - District Forest Officer Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar And Vikas) Sahkari Sangh Maryadit Jashpur Chhattisgarh 8 - Forest Range Officer Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar And Vikas) Sahkari Sangh Maryadit Kansabel District Jashpur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Syed Afaque Hussain Rizvi, Advocate For State : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 20/11/2025 1. At the outset learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merits, however, he may be permitted to submit fresh representation before the competent authority for redressal of his claim as pleaded in this writ petition seeking compensation under Rajmohni Devi Tendupatta Suraksha Yojya, and a direction be issued to concerned authority to consider and take decision on representation to be submitted by petitioner within specified time. 2. Learned counsel for the State submits that as the petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merit, she is having no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed off reserving liberty with the petitioner to submit 3 / 3 fresh representation before the concerned authority and if such representation is submitted, concerned authority shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, preferably within a further period of 3 months from the date of receipt of representation. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merit of writ petition. Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen