Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59783 (MAD)

AZIZUL KARIM v. THE SUB REGISTRAR

WP/18816/2025 · 2025-10-15

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 18816 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 18816 of 2025 Azizul Karim, S/o.Late.Abdul Malik, No.38, Thambhu Chetty Street, Mannady, Chennai-600 001. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Sub Registrar, Office of Sub-Registrar of Triplicane, No.268, Bharathi Salai, Express Estate, Royapettah, Chennai, Tamil Nadu-600 014. 2.S.Ibrahim, S/o.Sheik Mohammed, Residing at Old Door No.113, New No.180, Bells Road, Triplicane, Chennai-600 005. 3.Hamitha, W/o.Ibrahim, Residing At Old Door No.113, New No.180, Bells Road, Triplicane, Chennai-600 005. Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article under 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 st respondent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18816 of 2025 herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.04.2025 and to cancel the sale deed dated 08.11.2024 registered as Doc. No.1432 of 2024, within a time frame limit as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.V.Kumar for Mr.A.M.Sheik Mohammed Rafiq For Respondent: Mr.U.Baranidharan Special Government Pleader of R1 ORDER This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to direct the 1 st respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 16.04.2025 and to cancel the sale deed dated 08.11.2024 registered as Doc. No.1432 of 2024. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the 1 st respondent. 3.The grievance of the petitioner before this Court is that the representation of the petitioner dated 16.04.2025 has not been considered by the 1 st respondent so far. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18816 of 2025 4.This Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, as it is for the 1 st respondent to consider and decide the same on merits and in accordance with law. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, only by directing the 1 st respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 16.04.2025 and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law. Such exercise shall be carried on by the 1 st respondent within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 15-10-2025 rst Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To The Sub Registrar, Office of Sub Registrar of Triplicane, No.268, Bharathi Salai, Express Estate, Royapettah, Chennai, Tamil Nadu-600 014. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18816 of 2025 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. rst WP No.18816 of 2025 15-10-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis