CRM-M-11429 IN T 397 PRITAM SING STATE OF PU CORAM:- HO Present: Mr for Mr Mr for RUPINDERJIT 1. Th Suraksha Sanh 28.08.2025, un Station City Ho proceedings ari (Annexure P-1 2. Th to appear befor and the learned of the comprom 11429-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ AT CHANDIGAR CR Da SINGH KOCHAR AND ANOTHE Versus F PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPIN Mr. Abhishek Khullar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Angel Walia, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** ERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Se Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, for quash , under Sections 318 Bharatiya Ny ity Hoshiarpur, District Hoshiarpur gs arising therefrom on the basis of 1). This Court vide order dated 27.02 before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to arned Magistrate was directed to send promise. PUNJAB & HARYANA IGARH CRM-M-11429-2026 Date of decision: 07.04.2026 THER ….Petitioners ....Respondents UPINDERJIT CHAHAL cate der Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik quashing of FIR No.275, dated iya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police (Annexure P-2) and subsequent sis of compromise dated 15.01.2026 27.02.2026 had directed the parties rate to get their statements recorded o send its report qua the genuineness s ents garik ated olice uent 2026 rties rded ness GURPREET 2026.04.09 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document. CRM-M-11429 3. Pur Chief Judicial M the basis of the has submitted r been effected b undue influence 4. Lea have not dispute 5. In continue with th 6. Fol of this Court in another 2007 Supreme Court SCC 303, this p Sections 318 Hoshiarpur, Dis arising therefrom 1) are quashed. 7. Pen of, accordingly. 07.04.2026 Gurpreet 11429-2026 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, pa icial Magistrate, Hoshiarpur and got of the statements so recorded, Chief J itted report dated 17.03.2026 to the e cted between the parties voluntarily luence. Learned State counsel as well as disputed the factum of compromise bet In view of the above, no useful with the proceedings before the trial C Following the principles laid down ourt in Kulwinder Singh and others 007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 an ourt in Gian Singh Versus State of , this petition is allowed and FIR No 318 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20 ur, District Hoshiarpur (Annexure P- erefrom on the basis of compromise d shed. Pending miscellaneous application ingly. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No er, parties have appeared before the d got their statements recorded. On hief Judicial Magistrate, Hoshiarpur the effect that the compromise has tarily and without any coercion or ell as counsel for respondent No.2 ise between the parties. useful purpose would be served to trial Court in the instant FIR. d down by the Full Bench judgment hers Versus State of Punjab and 2 and approved by the Hon’ble te of Punjab and others (2012) 10 IR No.275, dated 28.08.2025, under ta, 2023, at Police Station City -2) and subsequent proceedings mise dated 15.01.2026 (Annexure P- lication(s), if any, stand(s) disposed (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE es/No e the . On arpur e has n or No.2 d to ment nd ble 10 nder City ings - osed AL) GURPREET 2026.04.09 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.