ADITYA INFOTECH THROUGH PAWAN KUMAR MAHUR MANGER LEGAL SECRETARIAL v. STATE OF U.P.
NA529/1608/2025 · 2025-05-29
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59779 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59779 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:93491 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1608 of 2025 Applicant :- Aditya Infotech Through Pawan Kumar Mahur Manger Legal Secretarial Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashwaini Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No. 1146 of 2017 in case crime no. 0587 of 2016 under Sections 420, 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Noida Sector-20, Gautam Buddh Nagar pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Buddh Nagar expeditiously within stipulated period.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the the applicant before this Court is the informant in the said case, which was pending since 2017 and even charges have not been framed so far. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said case.
4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer.
5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record.
6. The order passed by the High Court of Delhi dated 29.7.2024 has been submitted along with the supplementary affidavit by the
learned counsel for the applicant as ordered by the Court.
7. In view of the above, the Court concerned is expected and
directed to pass suitable order on the point of summoning in the matter in accordance with law preferably within two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, and if the accused, is summoned to face trial, all endeavours shall be made for expeditious disposal of the case preferably within two years, if there is no legal impediment. It is also directed that several dates have been fixed to obtain the death report of co-
accused Sanjay but the same was not produced before the Court, which is highly objectionable. The Court concerned is directed to use all its power given in the relevant laws to ensure the compliance of its own orders.
8. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case.
9. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad