47.wp.400.2023 Judgment.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.400 OF 2023 P ETITIONER S :- 1) Pramod Sudhakarrao Uke, Age:- 58 Yrs., Occu:- Agri., R/o. Pathrot, Tq. Achalpur, Dist. Amravati. 2) Devanand Shyamraoji Yevatkar, Age:- 56 Yrs., Occu:- Agri., R/o. Shindi Bk, Tq. Achalpur, Dist. Amravati. ..VERSUS.. RESPONDENTS :- 1) Sub-Divisional Officer, Achalpur, Tq. Achalpur, Dist. Amravati. 2) Naib Tahsildar, Achalpur, Tq. Achalpur, Dist. Amravati. 3) Narayan Shyamrao Dharpawar (Dead) through L.R. Rajendra Narayan Dharpawar Age:- 37 Yrs., Occu:- Agri., 4) Mahadevsingh Narayansingh Khanve (Dead) through L.R. Motisingh Mahadevsingh Khanve, Age:- 60 Yrs, Occu:- Agri., 5) Kashinath Gulabrao Bawanthade (Dead) through L.R. Pravin Kashinath Bawanthade, Age:- 79 Yrs., Occu:- Agri., 6) Ramdas Sakharam Bansod (Wireman), Age:- 75 Yrs., Occu:- Agri., 7) Suryabhan Raibhan Dandge, Age:- 82 Yrs., Occu:- Agri., 8) Sushilabai Chandrabhan Banewar, Age :- 65 Yrs., Occu:- Agri., 2025:BHC-NAG:12068 47.wp.400.2023 Judgment.odt 2 Respondent no. 3 to 8 R/o. Pathrot, Tq. Achalpur, Dist. Amravati. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr. P.A. Kadu, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. S. Khushalani, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 to 7/Caveator. Ms H.S. Dhande, A.G.P. for Respondents/State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE : 11/11/2025 ORAL JUDGMENT : 1. Heard. 2. The present petition arises out of a proceeding filed under Section 5 of the Mamlatdar’s Courts Act, 1906, for removal of obstruction on a road which was filed on 17.05.2017. The spot panchanama indicates that the obstruction was initially created in the year 2010 itself. The respondents who are the original applicants have filed reply in the present petition, along with which a communication dated 13.03.2014, addressed by the Talathi to the concerned Tahsildar, is annexed. This document is also shows that obstruction on the subject road was created by the petitioners. It implies that obstruction existed in the year 2014. 3. The learned Advocate for the petitioners draws attention to the order passed by the learned Mamlatdar as well as by the Sub- Divisional Officer/Revisional authority. Both these orders indicate 47.wp.400.2023 Judgment.odt 3 that the contention with respect to limitation was specifically raised but same is not answered. It will be pertinent to mention that the limitation for filing an application under Section 5 of the Mamlatdar’s Courts Act, 1906, is six months from the date of obstruction. 4. In view of the above, in the considered opinion of this Court, the impugned orders in the present petition are not sustainable and liable to be quashed. The matter is remitted to the learned Mamlatdar to decide the application afresh, including the issue of limitation. According, I pass the following order :- i) Writ petition is partly allowed. ii) The order dated 06.12.2022, passed by the Sub- Divisional Officer, Achalpur in jk-ek- dz-28@,elh,&05@2021&2022@dkerokMk and order dated 20.04.2022 passed by the Mamlatdar/Naib Tahsildar, Achalpur in jkekdz-2@,e-lh-,-5@dkerokMk@2017&18, are quashed and set aside. iii) The case No. jkekdz-2@,e-lh-,-5@dkerokMk@2017&18] is remitted to the learned Mamlatdar/Naib Tahsildar, 47.wp.400.2023 Judgment.odt 4 Achalpur, to decide the application afresh, including the point of limitation. iv) Parties shall appear before the learned Mamlatdar on 01.12.2025. Parties to note that, separate notice for appearance will not be issued. v) The learned Mamlatdar is directed to decide the application afresh as early as possible and in any case, on or before 30.04.2026. vi) No order as to costs. (ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.) C.L. Dhakate