HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 15614 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. This matter has been taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Mr. Aditya Vikram, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. S.D. Shukla, learned AGA for the State respondents. 3. This application under Section 482 CrPC has been preferred for quashing the impugned chargesheet no. NIL of 2012 dated 25.7.2012 as well as entire proceeding of Case No. 9926 of 2015 (State vs. Aseem Sonkar and others) arising out of NCR/Case Crime No. 61 of 2012, under Section 323, 504 IPC, P.S. Cantt, District Varanasi pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant and the opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the same has already been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on the record. It is also submitted that in view of the compromise arrived at between the applicant and opposite party no. 2, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed against the applicant. 5. On the other hand, learned AGA for the State has no objection to the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant. 6. In view of the fact that the applicant and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding verification of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Vikram, Ashwani Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Arti Devi .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) compromise is already on record and keeping in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed in respect of the applicant. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of impugned chargesheet no. NIL of 2012 dated 25.7.2012 as well as entire proceeding of Case No. 9926 of 2015 (State vs. Aseem Sonkar and others) arising out of NCR/Case Crime No. 61 of 2012, under Section 323, 504 IPC, P.S. Cantt, District Varanasi pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi are hereby quashed. 8. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands allowed. September 26, 2025 Abhishek A482 No. 15614 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad