- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14927 WP No. 101588 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 101588 OF 2025 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN: SRI. THIRUPATHI NAIK A. S/O. LAXMAN NAIK, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC: TECHNIAL ASSISTANT, KKRTC, HARAPANAHALLI DEPOT, HOSAPETE DIVISION, R/O: MACHIHALLI TANDA, PO. MACHIHALLI, TQ: HARAPANAHALLI, DISTRICT. VIJAYANAGAR – 583 137. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVI HEGDE & SRI. VINAYKUMAR BHAT, ADVOCATES) AND: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, K. K. R. T. C, HOSAPETE DIVISION, HOSAPETE – 583 201. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S.C.BHUTI, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE SUSPENSION ORDER DATED 21-01-2025, NUMBER.KA.KA.RA.SAA/ HO.VI/ SIBBANDI/ SHISTU/098/25/218/2025, VIDE ANNEXURE-E, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT, AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO REINSTATE THE PETITIONER BACK INTO SERVICE WITH ALL BENEFITS TO THE SAME PLACE AND POST, BY FIXING OUTER LIMIT, AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.11.07 11:53:41 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14927 WP No. 101588 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) The petitioner is before this court seeking the following prayer: a. Issue writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the suspension order dated 21.01.2025 number:KA.KA.RA.SAA/HO.VI/SIBBANDI/SHISTU /098/25/218/2025, vide Annexure-E issued by the respondent and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner back into service with all benefits to the same place and post, by fixing outer limit and b. Issue any other writ or order as this Hon’ble Court may deems fit in circumstances of the case including the cost, in the ends of justice. 2. What is called in question is an order of suspension. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the enquiry is concluded and the order of suspension has stood revoked. Since it has stood revoked, the petition is rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE kmv CT-ASC