Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5973 (RAJ)

BUDHIPRAKASH S/O KANHAIYALAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1739/2025 · 2025-02-13

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6423] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.1739/2025 1. Budhiprakash S/o Kanhaiyalal, Aged About 24 Years, 2. Roopsingh S/o Ramprasad, Aged About 32 Years, both are R/o Kasheempura, P.S. Aligarh, District Tonk. (Accused Petitioners Presently In Sawai Madhopur Jail.) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.2071/2025 Tejram S/o Kedar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Muie, Police Station Rawanjna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Tyagi, Adv. Mr. Tarun Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 13/02/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.08/2025, registered at Police Station Ravanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur, for the offence(s) under Section 318(4) of BNS and [2025:RJ-JP:6423] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1739/2025] Sections 66-C and 66-D of I.T. Act and Section 13 of the RPGO Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long, the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail applications. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case, the accused-petitioners are in custody since long, the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely; 1. Budhiprakash S/o Kanhaiyalal, 2. Roopsingh S/o Ramprasad and 3. Tejram S/o Kedar, in connection with FIR No.08/2025, registered at Police Station Ravanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur, shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /297-298