Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59725 (ALL)

JAI DEVI PATHAK AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/10059/2025 · 2025-05-18

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:82936-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10059 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jai Devi Pathak And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Upadhyay,Dilip Kumar Yadav,Nishtha Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Anil Kumar-X,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State- respondents. 2. Present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the First Information Report dated 12.04.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 0031 of 2025, Under Sections 85, 80(2), 89 of B.N.S.-2023 and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station- Mehnazpur, District-Azamgarh. 3. After substantial argument, once the court has declined to quash the impugned first information report, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners do not want to press the writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed and leave may be accorded to invoke the remedy as available in law. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Needless to say, in case the petitioners are aggrieved, they may avail the remedy as available in law. Order Date :- 19.5.2025 NLY (Anil Kumar-X,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad