48 CONT. PETITION NO. 603 OF 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 603 OF 2017 IN WP/4543/2002 Damayanti A. Zavar And Others VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others … Mr. Palodkar Devdatt P., Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. S. R. Yadav Lonikar, AGP for Respondent/s – State … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI & SMT. VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2025 P E R C O U R T : 1. Due to passage of time, nothing survives in the contempt petition. The same is, therefore, disposed of. 2. Petitioners are at liberty to agitate their grievance, if they so desire. (SMT. VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) komal kamble 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:26514-DB