Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59719 (CAL)

AMAR CHAND NAG v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/6907/2021 · 2025-11-13

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. 24 13.11.2025 (Item No.25 ) (AB) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side W.P.A. 6907 of 2021 Sri Amar Chand Nag VS The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Husen Mustafi, Advocate Ms. Suhana Parvin, Advocate …. For the petitioner Mr. Lalit Mahata, Advocate Mr. Kapil Guha, Advocate …. For the State Ms. Akansha Yadav, Advocate Ms. Sakshi Tiwari, Advocate …. For respondent no. 2 1. Mr. Mustafi, learned advocate appears for the petitioner and states that the petitioner has expired and seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. 4. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order be given to the parties, if applied for. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)