Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59716 (BOM)

TILAKCHAND MITARAMSAO KATAKWAR AND OTHER v. WAMAN PANDURANG MADANKAR AND OTHERS

CAS/1429/2023 · 2025-11-18

Shri Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

3.cas.1429.23 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application [CAS] No.1429 of 2023 in Second Appeal St. No.21408 of 2023 Tilakchand Mitaramsao Katakwar and another vs. Waman Pandurang Madankar and others =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. A. Saxena, Advocate for the Applicants/Appellants. Mr. P.J. Vairagade, Advocate for Non-Applicant/Respondent No.1. CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE : 18 th NOVEMBER, 2025. Heard. 02. There is a delay of 138 days caused in filing the second appeal. It is stated that the applicants are senior citizens and could not file the second appeal within the prescribed period of limitation due to financial difficulty. 03. The averments made in the application on affidavit are not disputed by filing reply. 04. In view of above, the delay caused in filing the second appeal is condoned. The second appeal be registered. The application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. Second Appeal St.No.21408/2023 : List the appeal for hearing on admission on 2nd December, 2025. JUDGE *sandesh