Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59716 (ALL)

AMAR NATH YADAV v. BHAIRAV NATH YADAV AND 3 OTHERS

A227/10090/2019 · 2025-05-18

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:83750 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10090 of 2019 Petitioner :- Amar Nath Yadav Respondent :- Bhairav Nath Yadav And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Tripathi,Suresh Chandra Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Alok Kumar Yadav,Rajesh Yadav Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. Even in the revised call no one has appeared on behalf of petitioner to press the writ petition, however, Sri Alok Kumar Yadav, learned counsel, is present for the respondents. 2. It is a case where the plaintiff respondent no. 1 had instituted a civil suit in which an application for grant of temporary injunction was moved, which was allowed by the trial court. Aggrieved defendant petitioner had filed a misc. civil appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1 (d) CPC, which was also dismissed. 3. I have heard learned counsel for respondents and perused the material on record. No case is made out for interfering with the interim injunction order granted by trial court and affirmed by the appellate court. 4. Writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. 5. Interim order, if any, stands discharged. Order Date :- 19.5.2025 Shekhar Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad