TUSHAR JAGANNATH AMBODKAR v. SAU.MINAL W/O TUSHAR AMBODKAR AND ANOTHER
APPR/110/2024 · 2025-08-21
Urmila Joshi Phalke
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59714 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59714 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 929appr110.2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPR) NO. 110 OF 2024 Tushar Jagannath Ambodkar Vs Minal w/o Tushar Ambodkar and another. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Mr. R.M. Tahliyani, counsel with Ms. Ragini Karni Swami, counsel for applicant. Mr. Piyush S. Girdekar, counsel for non-applicants.
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.
DATED : 21 /08/2025.
1. The application for condonation of delay has already been disposed of. However, the revision petition has not been registered due to non-removal of office objections.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant shall remove the office objections within one week.
3. On removal of the office objections, the revision application be registered, and be listed before this Court for final disposal.
4.
Learned counsel for the non-applicants pointed out that after filing of this application, some corrections was made in the judgment.
5.
Learned counsel for the applicant shall place on record the corrected copy of judgment.
[URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.] rkn