M/s Garrison Constructions, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/2531/2024 · 2025-12-28
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59710 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59710 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010042462024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between:
1. M/S GARRISON CONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, G. HEMANTH REDDY, S/O. G. BHASKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC SRINAGAR COLONY,
NEAR VIKUNTAPURAM, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.I.U., CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 86 PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVA DISTRICT. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2531/2024 M/S GARRISON CONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, G. HEMANTH REDDY, S/O. G. BHASKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC- CONTRACTOR, R/O.7 SRINAGAR COLONY,
NEAR VIKUNTAPURAM, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PR CIRCLE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.I.U., CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 86 PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVA RC,J W.P.No.2531 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] MONDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI M/S GARRISON CONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, G. HEMANTH REDDY, S/O. G. BHASKAR REDDY, CONTRACTOR, R/O.7-128/2, SRINAGAR COLONY,
NEAR VIKUNTAPURAM, TIRUPATI, ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, PR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. R, PR CIRCLE, CHITTOOR, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.I.U., CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE 86 PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR
RC,J W.P.No.2531 of 2024
2
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in withholding the payment of 2nd and Part bill amount of Rs. 1,60,04,473/- even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the work i.e. Upgradatin of Link road from Agraharam Reddivaripalle to Moogalamarri and Upgradation of Link road from Agraharam Reddivaripalle to Nimmanapalle - Vayalpad Road (Aramadaka), Madanapalle Assembly Constituency, Chittoor District, vide Agreement
No.22/2021-22, dt.31.05.2021, is questioned, as the same is illegal. arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider for payment of balance amount of Rs. 1,60,04,473/- with interest @12percent per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above- mentioned work forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may please to direct the respondents to consider for payment of balance amount of Rs. 1,60,04,473/- even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the work i.e.. Upgradatin of Link road from Agraharam Reddivaripalle to Moogalamarri and Upgradation of Link road from Agraharam Reddivaripalle to Nimmanapalle - Vayalpad Road (Aramadaka), Madanapalle Assembly Constituency, Chittoor District”, vide Agreement No.22/2021-22, dt.31.05.2021, forthwith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
RC,J W.P.No.2531 of 2024
3
ORDER
The Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent authorities in withholding the payment of second and part bill amount of Rs.1,60,04,473/- in respect of the work of Upgradation of Link road from Agraharam Reddivaripalle to Moogalamarri and Upgradation of Link road from Agraharam Reddivaripalle to Nimmanapalle-Vayalpad Road (Aramadaka), Madanapalle Assembly Constituency, Chittoor District.
2. In para 3(D) of the counter filed by the Superintending Engineer, PR Circle, Chittoor, it was stated that the petitioner has completed the works and out of the gross value of the bill of Rs.1,82,88,950/-, after the statutory recoveries of Rs.24,77,395/-, the outstanding net amount payable to the petitioner is Rs.1,58,11,555/-.
3. Ms. Naga Chandrika, learned Assistant Government Pleader prayed to grant six (06) months time to the authorities to pay the admitted amount to the petitioner.
4. Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned counsel for the petitioner, reported no objection for receiving the amount stated in the counter and for granting time as sought for by the learned Assistant Government Pleader.
5. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the authorities concerned to pay to the petitioner the admitted amount of
RC,J W.P.No.2531 of 2024
4
Rs.1,58,11,555/- within a period of six (06) months from the date of receipt of copy of the amount. The petitioner is at liberty to agitate his claim regarding interest and balance amount before a competent civil Court. There shall be no
order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Dated 29th day of December, 2025.
RR