Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59708 (KAR)

TUKARAM S/O KRISHNA SAVASE v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

MFA/104637/2022 · 2025-10-23

Geetha K B, S G Pandit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14174-DB MFA No. 104637 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. MFA NO. 104637 OF 2022 (LAC) BETWEEN: TUKARAM S/O KRISHNA SAVASE AGE. 56 YEARS, R/O GHARAGE PLOTS, VIJAYAPUR ROAD, JAMAKHANDI. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. BASAVARAJ S. BYAKOD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, UPPER KRISHNA PROJECT, JAMAKHANDI, DIST. BAGALKOT-587101. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/P BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BAGALKOT-587301. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 74 (1) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 14.10.2022 PASSED IN LAC.NO.5366/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAGALKOT TO SIT AT JAMKHANDI AND THE LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT AUTHORITY, JAMKHANDI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 64 OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 & ETC. RAKESH S HARIHAR Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14174-DB MFA No. 104637 of 2022 THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT) Learned counsel appearing for the appellant Shri Basavaraj S.Byakod submits that the appellant has not come forward to pay deficit Court fee. Hence, he submits that appropriate order may be passed. Since the appellant has failed to deposit the deficit Court fee, the appeal stands dismissed. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (GEETHA K.B.) JUDGE VNP / CT: VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 12