Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59704 (CHH)

SMT. RUKMANI GUPTA v. SMT. INDRANI GUPTA

MCC/1194/2025 · 2025-11-23

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:56867 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1194 of 2025 Smt. Rukmani Gupta W/o Shrikant Gupta, Aged About 56 Years, (wrongly written as Smt. Ruknai Gupta), R/o Behind Vindhayawasini Mandir, Kanha General Stores, Mathpara Birgaon, Tehsil And Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant(s) versus 1. Smt. Indrani Gupta W/o Manoj Gupta Aged About 38 Years R/o Behind Vindhayawasini Mandir, Kanha General Stores, Mathpara Birgaon, Tehsil And Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Manoj Gupta S/o Tukau Saheb Aged About 42 Years R/o Behind Vindhayawasini Mandir, Kanha General Stores, Mathpara Birgaon, Tehsil And Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Raipur, Tahsil And Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kishan Lal Sahu, Dy. Govt. Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Krishnakant Prajapati, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 24/11/2025 1. The Applicant/ respondent No.1 has filed the instant MCC seeking modification and correction in the cause title of order dated 11.08.2025 passed in SA No. 658 of 2017 wherein inadvertently in place of “ Smt. Rukmani Gupta” it has wrongly been typed as Smt. Ruknai Gupta. SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Digitally signed by SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2025.11.25 10:31:58 +0530 2 2. Accordingly, it is ordered that instead of Smt. Ruknai Gupta, it be read as Smt. Rukmani Gupta, and rest of the order passed in SA No. 658 of 2017 on 11.08.2025 by this Court shall remain intact. 3. With this direction, the instant MCC stands disposed of. 4. A Copy of this order be retained in the original file of SA No. 658 of 2017. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Santosh