HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 35/2025 in SB Civil Restoration Application No. 117/2024 1. Deendayal Son Of Late Motiram, Resident Of Village Jaisinghpura Khor, Tehsil And District Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Narendra Son Of Late Motiram, Resident Of Village Jaisinghpura Khor, Tehsil And District Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Deep Chand Son Of Late Motiram, Resident Of Village Jaisinghpura Khor, Tehsil And District Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Rajkumar Son Of Late Motiram, Resident Of Village Jaisinghpura Khor, Tehsil And District Jaipur (Raj.) 5. Smt. Ramphuli Devi (Deceased) Widow Of Late Moti Ram, Resident Of Village Jaisinghpura Khor, Tehsil And District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. Anil Kumar Son Of Late Gendi Lal, Resident Of 38/103, Kiran Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur. 2. Vimal Kumar Son Of Late Gendi Lal, Resident Of 38/103, Kiran Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur. 3. Pradeep Kumar Son Of Late Gendi Lal, Resident Of 38/103, Kiran Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur. 4. Kapurchand Son Of Bhori Lal, Resident Of Village Jaisihnghpura Khor, Tehsil And District Jaipur. 5. Bhagchand Son Of Bhori Lal, Resident Of Village Jaisihnghpura Khor, Tehsil And District Jaipur. 6. Shanti Kumar Son Of Late Ladu Lal, Resident Of Plot No. G-4, Nursary Circle, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. 7. Ramesh Chand Son Of Late Ladu Lal, Resident Of Plot No. G-4, Nursary Circle, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. 8. Tara Chand Son Of Late Ladu Lal, Resident Of Plot No. G- 4, Nursary Circle, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. 9. Tehsildar, Tehsil Jaipur, District Jaipur. 10. Jaipur Development Authority, Through Its Secretary J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur. (2 of 2) [WMAP-35/2025] ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 13/02/2025 The present application has been filed by the petitioners for condonation of delay in depositing the cost of Rs. 5,000/- as imposed by this Court vide order dated 12.11.2024 and for taking on record the receipt regarding deposition of cost. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has deposited the cost of Rs. 5,000/- as imposed by this Court vide order dated 12.11.2024 but some delay has occurred which is unintentional. So, in the interest of justice, delay in depositing the cost be condoned. For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed. Delay in depositing the cost is condoned. The receipt regarding deposition of cost of Rs. 5,000/- as imposed by this Court vide order dated 12.11.2024 is ordered to be taken on record. Office is directed to proceed further in the matter. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Gorav/71