KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAMA LIMITED v. THE SEPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
MFA/104666/2024 · 2025-11-07
Chillakur Sumalatha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59675 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59675 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15289 MFA No. 104666 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 104666 OF 2024 (LAC) BETWEEN:
KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAMA LIMITED, BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SINGATALURU LIFT IRRIGATION PROJECT, KNNL, NO.1, MUNDARAGI-582118. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. CHETAN MUNNOLI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KNNL, SINGATALUTU LIFT IRRIGATION PROJECT, HUVINAHADAGALI-583219, DIST: BALLARI.
2.
IRAPPA S/O. SHIRAKAPPA JADRA, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. SINGATALUR, TQ: MUNDARGI, DIST: GADAG-582118. …RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 64 (1) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN LAC NO.113/2019 DATED 30.10.2023 ON THE FILE OF LEARNED PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, GADAG AND THE LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT AUTHORITY 2013; ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, GADAG AND THE LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT AUTHORITY 2013 PASSED IN LAC NO.113/2019 DATED 30.10.2023 AND ETC.
GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15289 MFA No. 104666 of 2024
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS PASSED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA)
The appeal was filed in the year 2024 and till now, office objections are not complied. Sufficient time already granted. This Court does not find any grounds to grant further time. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE
RH CT-MCK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5