Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5967 (UTT)

KARTIK v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/405/2025 · 2025-08-13

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No.405 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Ms. Sweta Dobhal, learned B.H. for the State. 3. Ms. Farheen Bano, learned counsel i/b Mr. A.K. Beniwal, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 4. Objection has been filed by the State along with the delay condonation application (IA/3/2025). For the reasons stated, application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Objection filed by State is taken on record. 5. Learned State Counsel on the basis of pleadings made in the objections, submits that on completion of investigation, a final report has been submitted in the matter in favour of petitioner. 6. In such view of the matter, nothing survives in the matter. The petition is, accordingly, closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 13.08.2025 R.Dang