IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA SECOND APPEAL NO: 882 OF 2017 Appeal under section 100 against orders aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed in AS No.lOO of 2002 dt.18.04.2017 on the file of the VIII Additional District Judge, Chittoor in setting aside the Judgment and decree passed by the II Additional O.S No.289 of 1997 dt.26.06.2002 Between: AMARAVATI RAO Junior Civil Judge, Chittoor, in G. Krishna reddy, S/o Chidambaram Reddy, Aged Cultivation, Hindu, R/o. Gurralamitta Bangarupalem, Mandal, Chittoor District. about 71 years, Occ; Village, Budithireddipalle Post, ...Appellant/Respondent/Plaintiff AND 1. K. Mogill Reddy (died), 2. K. Savithramma, W/o. K. Mogili Reddy, Aged about 55 3. K. Haritha, D/o. Mogili Reddy, Aged about 35 4. K. Kishore Kumar are R/o. Hindus, years years, S/o Mogili Reddy, Aged aout 30 years All Cultivation, Budithireddipalle Post, Bangarupalem, Mandal, Chittoor District. R/o Gurralamitta village ...Respondents/Appellants/Defednants •• LA. NO: 1 OF 2017(SAMP. NO: 1740 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.100 of 2002 Dated 18-04-2017 on the file of VIII Additional District Judge, Chittoor, pending disposal of the main Second Appeal. ••• i Counsel for the Appellants: Sri. P RAVI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. T G PRASAD REDDY The Court made the following Judgment: THE HON^BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL No.882 of 2017 JUDGMENT: Learned counsel for the appellant is present. 1. Learned counsel for the respondents appearing through 2. virtual mode represented that they filed a memo before the Registry vide U.S.R.No.35124 of 2022, dated 27.06.2022, stating that the sole appellant expired on 27.11.2019 and also annexed a copy of the death certificate. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant represented that he is not having any instructions. 4. Considering the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTfON OFFICER To, 1. The VIII Additional District Judge, Chittoor. (with records 2. The II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Chittoor. 3. One CC to Sri. P Ravi Kiran, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri. T G Prasad Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of A.P. at Amaravathi. 6. Three CD Copies if any) YM sree HIGH COURT DATED;23/01/2025 ^ V T'"! - ’A JUDGMENT SA.No.882 of 2017 2 0 FEB 2025 | D ^ Current Section ^ j Op^zj,\-rr- DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL AS ABATED WITHOUT COSTS