IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49154 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-144 Year-2024 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1. Musafir Rai Son of Ram Janam Rai Resident of village - Bahrampur, P.S.- Rushtampur, District - Vaishali 2. Manju Devi Wife of Musafir Rai Resident of village - Bahrampur, P.S.- Rushtampur, District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivjee Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 2 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 201, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The allegation in the first information report is that the daughter of the informant was done to death by the accused persons on account of non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are the mother-in-law and father- in-law of the deceased and there are general and omnibus allegation in the first information report. It has been submitted that the petitioners are separate in both residence and mess and are not concerned with the day to day affairs of the deceased Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49154 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 2/2 and her husband. As a matter of fact, the deceased had died due to some ailment and subsequently the first information report was lodged. It is next submitted that the husband of the deceased who is primarily responsible for the welfare of the wife is already in custody since 26.03.2025 and the present petitioners are in custody since 20.02.2025. Further, the brother- in-law of the deceased has already been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 30.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 75397 of 2024. 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances and also considering that the husband of the deceased is already in custody, let the above named petitioners, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 144 of 2024. devendra/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T