APHC010687082025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35744/2025 Between: 1. KOTA NARAYANA SWAMI,, S/O. GANGARAJU, MALE, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, RIO. RAMALAYAM ROAD, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, EAST YADAVALLI, DWARAKATHIRUMALA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522238 2. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, ELURU DISTRICT AT ELURU- 534001 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, JANGAREDDYGUDEM DIVISION, ELURU DISTRICT-534447 4. THE STATE HOUSE OFFICER, CHINTHALAPUDI POLICE STATION, ELURU DISTRICT-534461 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , AT KAMAVARAPUKOTA, ELURU DISTRICT-534426 6. LOKALA VENKATESWARARAO, , S/O. GANGARAJU, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. EAST EDAVALLI VILLAGE, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT534426 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PATHURI SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35744/2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of 5th respondent at the instance of 6th respondent in repeatedly insisting the petitioner to appear before the 5th respondent police station and high handedly insisting the petitioner to settle the civil disputes connected to total agricultural land of Ac.3.00 cents, covered by survey numbers 100-2 and 100-3 of Edavalli Revenue Village in Kamavaraupkota Mandal of Eluru District and yield to the demands of 5th respondent as illegal, irregular, irrational, arbitrary, without any authority of law and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 5th respondent not to interfere in any manner with petitioner’s possession over the said lands nor in their personal liberty.…” 2. Heard Sri P.Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri.P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the official respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent- police are repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station at the instance of the unofficial respondent No.6 and insisting the petitioner to settle the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent No.6. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the respondent-police never called the 4 petitioner to the police station and never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties. 5. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station without there being any crime registered against him. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 29.12.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35744/2025 Dated.29.12.2025 UPS 143