Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59660 (PNJ)

KARANBIR SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/30674/2025 · 2025-07-21

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

324(2) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA KARANBIR SINGH & OTHERS STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Mr. Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG, Punjab. Mr. HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. Instant petition has been filed under Section quashing of the 324, 506, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code (Section 326 of IPC added later on) in case bearing FIR No.61 dated 24.08.2023 unde of IPC registered at Police Station Fattudhinga, District Kapurthala (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proc compromise dated 2. The following order was passed on IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: KARANBIR SINGH & OTHERS V/S PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. L.S. Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Amandeep Singh Jawandha, Advocate for respondent No.2 **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) Instant petition has been filed under Section quashing of the Rapat No.20 dated 30.08.2023, 506, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code (Section 326 of IPC added later on) in case bearing FIR No.61 dated 24.08.2023 unde f IPC registered at Police Station Fattudhinga, District Kapurthala (Annexure all subsequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of compromise dated 21.04.2025 (Annexure P-2). The following order was passed on “This petition has been filed under Section seeking quashing of Rapat No.20 dated 30.08.2023, under Sections 323, 324, 506, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code (Section 326 of IPC added later on) in case bearing FIR No.61 dated 24.08.2023 under Sections 324, 427, 148, 149 o f IPC registered at Police Station Fattudhinga, District Kapurthala (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-30674-2025 Date of decision: 21.07.2025 ...PETITIONERS ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR Lakhanpal, Advocate for the petitioners. Advocate for respondent No.2 . Advocate for respondent No.2 . Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C seeking registered under Sections 323, 506, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code (Section 326 of IPC added later on) in case bearing FIR No.61 dated 24.08.2023 under Sections 324, 427, 148, 149 f IPC registered at Police Station Fattudhinga, District Kapurthala (Annexure eedings arising out of the same, on the basis of The following order was passed on 29.05.2025 :- petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Rapat No.20 dated 30.08.2023, registered under Sections 323, 324, 506, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code (Section 326 of IPC added later on) in case bearing FIR No.61 dated 24.08.2023 under Sections 324, 427, 148, 149 o f IPC registered at Police Station Fattudhinga, District Kapurthala along with all subsequent proceedings arising HIMANSHU 2025.07.23 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-30674-2025 3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. 4. In view of the compromise and the Hon’ble Supreme Court in and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46 Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 Kulwinder Singh 2025 2 therefrom on the basis of compromise dated P-4). Notice of motion. At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab respondent No.1-State and Mr. Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.2 and files his power of attorney, which is taken on record compromise. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during the course of day. Service is complete. To be heard along with CRM 21.07.2025. In the meantime, Parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within a period of two weeks or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of the compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed i.e. 21.07.2025. A copy of this order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46, and Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 21.04.2025 (Annexure At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl. A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of and Mr. Amandeep Singh Jawandha, Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.2 and files his power of attorney, which is taken on record. He admits to the factum of Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during To be heard along with CRM-M No.27579 of 2025 i.e. on In the meantime, Parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within a period of two weeks nt to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed A copy of this order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance.” In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. and Full Bench of this Court in Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition HIMANSHU 2025.07.23 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-30674-2025 is allowed and Rapat No.20 324, 506, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code (Section 326 of IPC added later on) in case bearing FIR No.61 dated 24.08.2023 u of IPC registered at Police Station Fattudhinga, District Kapurthala (Annexure P-1)and all consequential the petitioners. July 21, 2025 himanshu (i) (ii) 2025 3 Rapat No.20 dated 30.08.2023, 324, 506, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code (Section 326 of IPC added later on) in case bearing FIR No.61 dated 24.08.2023 unde f IPC registered at Police Station Fattudhinga, District Kapurthala (Annexure consequential proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable registered under Sections 323, 324, 506, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code (Section 326 of IPC added later on) nder Sections 324, 427, 148, 149 f IPC registered at Police Station Fattudhinga, District Kapurthala (Annexure proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No HIMANSHU 2025.07.23 11:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document