APHC010329212025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 16969/2025 Between: 1. DATTALA SATYANANDAM, S/O DATTALA JOHN PETER, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC DRIVER, R/O D.NO.5-34, HARIJANAPETA, NEAR CHURCH, GARAGAPARRU VILLAGE, PALAKODERU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. . 3. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MPDO, PALAKODERU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GARAGAPARRU VILLAGE, PALAKODERU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT., 5. DATTALA ASIRVADAM, S/O DATTALA SUNDARA RAO AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO.5-68, DATTALA VARI STREET, GARAGAPARRU VILLAGE, PALAKODERU MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent issued impugned notice vide NIL, dated 26.04.2025 on behalf of the 5th respondent is being illegal, arbitrary, violation of principal of natural justice and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and this Honble court to set aside the impugned notice vide NIL, dated 26.04.2025 issued by the 4th respondent on behalf of the 5th respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the impugned notice NIL, dated 26.04.2025 issued by the 4th respondent, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR and Dr. P.B Reddy Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ORDER: Impugning the notice dated 26.04.2025 issued by the 4th respondent, the present writ petition is filed. 2. Heard Sri P.V.Venkata Ravi Sankar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Y.Koteswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Gram Panchayat for the respondents. 3. Sri Y.Koteswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for the Gram Panchayat, on instructions dated 24.11.2025, submitted that the dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent is civil in nature and that 3 the notice issued by the 4th respondent has been withdrawn. Accordingly, he prayed for dismissal of the writ petition. 4. In view of the submission that the 4th respondent–Gram Panchayat has already withdrawn the impugned notice, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 30.12.2025 SNI 4 219 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 16969/2025 Date: 30.12.2025 SNI