COCP-2531 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 111 Mukesh Rani Sh. Anurag Rastogi, IAS and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. proceedings order dated this Court in CWP and others’ along with other c have been directed as follows : 2531-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Mukesh Rani Versus Sh. Anurag Rastogi, IAS and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Amit Dhanda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent order dated 17.03.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by this Court in CWP-1965-2025 titled as ‘Mukesh Rani ’ along with other connected case been directed as follows :- “….the respondent-State of Haryana to submit the demanded information to the Haryana Staff Selection Commission within a period of four weeks of receipt of certified copy of this order and also to the Haryana Staff Selection Commission to thereafter recommend the names of the petitioners for appointment against Group ESP category, subject to the petitioners being higher in order of merit as compared to the last candi the Haryana Staff Selection Commission. Failure on the part of the respondent-State in furnishing the information regarding available vacancy position and/or denial of appointment on a report that there are no other vacancies IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2531-2025 Date of Decision: 20.05.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Amit Dhanda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondent(s) for not complying the 1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of Mukesh Rani vs. State of Haryana onnected case, vide which the respondents State of Haryana to submit the demanded information to the Haryana Staff Selection Commission within a period of four weeks of receipt of certified copy of der and also to the Haryana Staff Selection Commission to thereafter recommend the names of the petitioners for appointment against Group-D posts under ESP category, subject to the petitioners being higher in order of merit as compared to the last candidate recommended by Staff Selection Commission. Failure on the part State in furnishing the information regarding available vacancy position and/or denial of appointment on a report that there are no other vacancies contempt for not complying the Bench of Haryana State of Haryana to submit the demanded information to the Haryana Staff Selection Commission within a period of four weeks of receipt of certified copy of der and also to the Haryana Staff Selection Commission to thereafter recommend the names of the D posts under ESP category, subject to the petitioners being higher in order date recommended by Staff Selection Commission. Failure on the part State in furnishing the information regarding available vacancy position and/or denial of appointment on a report that there are no other vacancies RISHU KATARIA 2025.05.20 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2531 2. instructions submits that reproduced above, re under General (ESP) category been made vide order dated Staff Selection Commission, 3. Court by learned counsel for the respondent Registry to tag/paginate the same at the appropriate place in the paper book. 4. the petitioner who after going through the same dated 17.03.2025 stands does not want to press the instant petition any further. 5. 6. 7. 20.05.2025 rishu 2531-2025 -2- available, shall not be construed as a sufficient reason to deny the rights of the petitioners on their own merit At the very outset, learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that in compliance of the direction of this Court reproduced above, recommendation for appointment of under General (ESP) category for the post of Group been made vide order dated 20.05.2025, issued by the Secretary, Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula. Copy of the aforesaid order dated learned counsel for the respondent Registry to tag/paginate the same at the appropriate place in the paper A copy thereof, has also been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner who after going through the same dated 17.03.2025 stands duly complied with by the respondents does not want to press the instant petition any further. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable shall not be construed as a sufficient reason to deny the rights of the petitioners on their own merit….” earned counsel for the State on in compliance of the direction of this Court for appointment of the petitioner for the post of Group-D (Peon), has duly 20.05.2025, issued by the Secretary, Haryana opy of the aforesaid order dated 20.05.2025 handed over in learned counsel for the respondent-State is taken on record. Registry to tag/paginate the same at the appropriate place in the paper- has also been supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner who after going through the same admits that the order complied with by the respondents; and he does not want to press the instant petition any further. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No shall not be construed as a sufficient reason to earned counsel for the State on in compliance of the direction of this Court the petitioner 20.05.2025, issued by the Secretary, Haryana handed over in is taken on record. has also been supplied to learned counsel for order and he RISHU KATARIA 2025.05.20 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.