APHC010053662003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18633/2003 Between: 1. K. NARASIMHA REDDY, S/O. K.SIVARAMI REDDY UDAYAMANIKYAM PACS LIMITED, SECRETARY, ERRAVARIPALYAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE COMMISSIONER FOR COOP REGISTRAR OF COOP STS 3 ORS, OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, ERRAVARIPALAYAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, CHITTOOR. 3. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE UDAYAMANIKYAM PACS LIMITED REP BY ITS, PERSON-IN- CHARGE/CHAIRMAN, ERRAVARIPALYAM MANDAL, MADANPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent passed in Rc.No.4137/2003/ 1A/IV, dated 12.3.2003 and the consequential order of the 2nd respondent passed in Rc.No.440/99-G, dated 26.3.2003 as illegal, arbitrary and pass. IA NO: 2 OF 2003(WPMP 23264 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the proceedings of the 1st respondent passed in Rc.No.4137/2003/1A/IV, dated 12.3.2003 and the consequential order of the 2nd respondent passed in Rc.No.440/99-G, dated 26.3.2003 pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WVMP 1582 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order granted on 3-9-2003 in WP No.18633 of 2003 dt.3.9.2003 and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR AGRICULTURE The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 18633/2003 ORDER: Sri P.Sravan Kumar Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri O.Manohar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not in contact with him for a long time and he has no instructions in the matter. 2. When the writ petitions are pending before the Courts, the parties should invariably be in contact with their advocate. However, in the present case, the petitioner had not been pursuing the case through his advocate, it shows that the cause must have become infructuous and hence petitioner is not having interest in pursuing the matter. Hence, the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, if the petitioners feel that the cause still survives, they can file appropriate application within a period of two (02) months. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 09th October, 2025 RKS