Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59628 (PNJ)

SARU SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/14431/2025 · 2025-07-09

Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-14431-2025 (O&M) 137 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Saru Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Mr. Kuljit Singh, Additional AG Punjab. SUDHIR SINGH Present Writ in the nature of petitioner qua adjoining Plot No.C at SAS Nagar Mohali One Time Settlement scheme/ Annuity Scheme (Annexure P the Government of Punjab 2. At the outset, l petitioner would be satisfied, in case, 12.04.2025 (Annexure which has not been adverted 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: versus Punjab and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the Mr. Kuljit Singh, Additional AG Punjab. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents qua revival of the allotment of plot measuring 4001 sq. yards Plot No.C-89 (Opposite Water Works) Near Focal Point, Phase Nagar Mohali in light of the Standard Operating Procedure (SPO)/ One Time Settlement scheme/ Annuity Scheme (Annexure P the Government of Punjab within time bound frame At the outset, learned counsel for the would be satisfied, in case, his (Annexure P-26) is considered and not been adverted to by the respondents till date. 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14431-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: July 09, 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kuljit Singh, Additional AG Punjab. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ the respondents to consider claim of the revival of the allotment of plot measuring 4001 sq. yards 89 (Opposite Water Works) Near Focal Point, Phase-VII in light of the Standard Operating Procedure (SPO)/ One Time Settlement scheme/ Annuity Scheme (Annexure P-25) issued by frame. earned counsel for the petitioner submits that his pending representation dated and decided by respondent No.2, by the respondents till date. 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 Petitioner s Writ to consider claim of the revival of the allotment of plot measuring 4001 sq. yards VII in light of the Standard Operating Procedure (SPO)/ 25) issued by submits that dated , MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.15 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-14431-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned State counsel appears and opposes issuance of notice of motion. He submits that grievance of the petitioner will be looked into by respondent No.2 and it shall take decision either way, on his pending representation dated 12.04.2025 (Annexure P-26). 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the pending representation dated 12.04.2025 (Annexure P-26) and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 06 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE July 09, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.15 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment