Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59620 (AP)

BANDREDDY SRINIVASA RAO @ SRINIVAS v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/9586/2022 · 2025-12-28

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010653512022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9586/2022 Between: 1. BANDREDDY SRINIVASA RAO @ SRINIVAS, S/O. GANGARAO, AGE. 51 YEARS, OCC. LIC AGENT, D-NO. 1-47-93, GOLLAGUDEM CENTRE, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. BANDREDDY SURESH RAJA,, S/O. GANGARAO, AGE. 47 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, D-NO. 1-47-93, GOLLAGUDEM CENTRE, TADEPALLIGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. BANDREDDY PRABHU DEVA,, S/O. SURESH RAJA, AGE. 22 YEARS, D-NO. 1-47-93, GOLLAGUDEM CENTRE, TADEPALLIGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. GUNDUMOGULA SURESH,, S/O. VENKATA NAGESWARARAO, AGE. 48 YEARS, D-NO. 15-12/1, KODEVARI STREET, PATHURU, TADEPALLIGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY S.H.O, TADEPALLIGUDEM TOWN P.S., WEST GODAVARI, REP. THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HON'BLE HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI, FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. BHOGAVALLI RAJESWARA RAO, S/O. SURYANARAYANAMURTHY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, D NO.13- 10-1 / 12,TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. V S R S NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., has been filed by the Petitioners, seeking quashment of proceedings against them in C.C.No.26 of 2021 on the file of the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tadepalligudem under Sec.341, 323 and 506 R/w. 34 I.P.C. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that no cause survives for adjudication in the Criminal Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submissions, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 29.12.2025 ASR 3 41 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.9586 of 2022 Dt.29.12.2025 ASR