Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59617 (AP)

Y.Malleswara Rao v. The Chief General manager,

WA/198/2006 · 2025-12-28

A Hari Haranadha Sarma, Battu Devanand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010274112006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3545] MONDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO: 198/2006 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Against Order made in W.P.No.26878 of 2001 dt. 27.1.2006. Between: 1.Y.MALLESWARA RAO, S/O. PINNAIAH ASSISTANT MANAGER, REMOVED FROM SERVICE, R/O. FLAT NO, B/D-$, 'B' CAMP, KURNOOL-500 004. ...APPELLANT AND 1.THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, (APPELLATE AUTHORITY), STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, HYDERABAD. 2.THE GENERAL MANAGER D PB, AND APPOINTING AUTHORITY, STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, HYDERABAD. 3.THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER AND, DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, ZONAL OFFICE, STATE BANK OF INDIA, HYDERABAD. 4.SRI A RAMA RAO, CHIEF GENERAL NAD ENQUIRY AUTHORITY, ZONAL OFFICE, STATE BANK OF INDIA, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WAMP 411 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased expedite the hearing of the W.A. preferably in the first week of March 2006 and pass. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to recall the order dated 02-01-2015 made in W.A. No 198/2006 and restore the W.A. to file and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 1238 in filing the restoration petition order dated, 01- 2015 made in .A. No 198/2006 and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1.CHINTALAPUDI LAKSHMI KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.V UMA DEVI 2.M V S SAI KUMAR The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO.198 of 2006 JUDGMENT : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) On 06.10.2025 and 17.11.2025, there was no representation for the appellant and to give one more opportunity to the appellant, this appeal was posted to today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, it appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the case. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND __________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA Date : 29.12.2025 SAB 4 125 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT APPEAL NO: 198 of 2006 Date : 29.12.2025 SAB