Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59609 (AP)

N VENKANNA v. SRI G SAI PRASAD IAS

CC/2892/2025 · 2025-12-29

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010475942025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2892/2025 Between: 1. N VENKANNA, S/O. N DEVAYYA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O D-NO.1-135, BOBBARLANKA (V), ATREYAPURAM (M), EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SHRI SAGILI SHAN MOHAN I A S, T HE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, (IRRIGATION WING), RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. N NARASIMHA MURTHY, THE CHIEF ENGINEER POLAVARAM PROJECT, DOWLIESWARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 5. SRI D YESU BABU, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, P.I.P.L.M.C CIRCLE, TUNI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. SRI N P RAJESWARA RAO, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, P.I.P.L.M.C. DIVISION NO.2, 2 JS,J C.C.No.2892/2025 DOWLIESWARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents U/s. 10 to 12 of contempts of Court Acts for willful and deliberate violation of Final order passed in WP No 4749/2025 dated 29.04.2025 by Learned Single Judge and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. BALA MOHAN RAO S 2. 3 JS,J C.C.No.2892/2025 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the order passed by this Court. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 30.12.2025 RSD 4 JS,J C.C.No.2892/2025 53 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2892/2025 Dated: 30.12.2025 RSD