BALLA VENKATA PRAVEEN v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/35643/2025 · 2025-12-28
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59604 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 59604 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010685392025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35643/2025 Between:
BALLA VENKATA PRAVEEN, S/O. UMA MAHESWARARAO,AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 2-97, PUNADIPADU, PUNADIPADU POST, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-521151.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 522238
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI. 522503
3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NTR COMMISSIONERATE, ANDHRA PRADESH.520010
4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 520010
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GUNADALA P.S. VIJAYAWADA CITY, NTR DISTRICT 520004
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent more particularly 4th and 5th respondents in not completing the investigation in crime No.23 of 2025 on the file of Gunadala Police Station(5th respondent) Dated.21-02-2025 and in Crime No.88/2025 on the file of Gunadala Police Station (5th
respondent) dated.07-07-2025 as illegal, arbitrary,
2
unconstitutional and violation of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents more particularly 4th and 5threspondents to complete the investigation in crime No.23 of 2025 on the file of Gunadala Police Station(5th respondent) Dated 21-02-2025 and in Crime No.88/2025 on the file of Gunadala Police Station (5th respondent) dated.07-07-2025 and for other incidental relief.”
2. Sri Challa Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, despite registration of Crime No.23 of 2025 on the file of Gunadala Police Station for the offences under Sections 329(3), 324(4) and 292 read with 3(5) of BNS, the Police did not choose to conclude the investigation and file a report.
3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the investigation in the said crime is almost completed and the Police may file report in this matter as early as possible.
4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed to conclude the investigation in Crime No.23 of 2025 on the file of Gunadala Police Station and file a report in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this
order. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:29.12.2025 Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.35643 of 2025
Dt.29.12.2025
Dinesh