- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14170 WP No. 102563 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO.102563 OF 2025 (LR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GANGUTAI W/O. SHANKAR ALURI, AGE: 82 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O: NIDASOSHI VILLAGE – 591 236, TALUK: HUKKERI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI. 2. SHRI. RAJASHEKHAR S/O. SHANKAR ALURI, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: NIDASOSHI VILLAGE – 591 236, TALUK: HUKKERI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI. 3. SHRI MOHANDAS S/O. SHANKAR ALURI, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: NIDASOSHI VILLAGE – 591 236, TALUK: HUKKERI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. P. G. NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE LAND TRIBUNAL, HUKKERI, BY ITS SECRETARY – 591 236. 2. SHRI. CHANDRAKANT DUNDAPPA HUDDAR, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: AMMANAGI VILLAGE – 591 236, TALUK: HUKKERI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI. 3. SMT. SHANTA W/O. SHIVAPPA TALANDAGI, AGE: 76 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: AMMANAGI VILLAGE – 591 236, TALUK: HUKKERI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI. 4. SMT JAYASHREE W/O. MALLIKARJUN PATIL, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14170 WP No. 102563 of 2025 R/O: AMMANAGI VILLAGE – 591 236, TALUK: HUKKERI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI. 5. SHRI. MALLIKARJUN SHIVAPPA TALANDAGI, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: AMMANAGI VILLAGE – 591 236, TALUK: HUKKERI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MALA B. BHUTE, AGA FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER AT ANNEXURE-F PASSED IN TNC:SR-943 ON 08/04/1988 BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 LAND TRIBUNAL HUKKERI BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) 1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners’ father had questioned the order at Annexure-F in W.P.No.22223/1992. 3. It is stated that the said writ petition is dismissed as abated. If that is the case, the petitioner has to file application to recall that order and to set-aside - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14170 WP No. 102563 of 2025 the abatement, or if the order dismissing the petition as abated is passed erroneously, then the petitioner has to file a writ appeal. 4. Under these circumstances, the writ petition is not entertained and accordingly stands dismissed, without entering into the merits. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE AM/- CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6