Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 59561 (KAR)

VIJAYALAXMI W/O LATE SURESH JITURI v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

WA/100214/2024 · 2025-09-08

S Sunil Dutt Yadav, Vijaykumar A Patil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11488-DB WA No. 100214 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL WRIT APPEAL NO. 100214 OF 2024 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: 1. VIJAYALAXMI W/O. LATE SURESH JITURI, AGE: 66 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD/BUSINESS, R/O.33, 39 APOORVA NAGAR, MANJUNATH NAGAR, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI-580009. 2. SMT. ARUNA W/O. RAJESH BURBURE, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O.H.NO.37, PURUSHOTTAM NAGAR, VIDYANAGAR NAGAR, HUBBALLI-580009. 3. SMT. SUVARNA W/O. VINAY JARTARGHAR, AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O. EUREKA COLONY, KUSUGAL ROAD, HUBBALLI-580009. Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11488-DB WA No. 100214 of 2024 4. JAAYACHAND S/O. TUKARAMSA JITURI, AGE: 71 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. GURUKRUPA, 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS, MANJUNATH NAGAR, HUBBALLI-580009. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. B. S. SANGATI, ADVOCATE) AND: THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, AND SLAO, DHARWAD-580001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. V. S. KALASURMATH, AGA) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S.4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE WRIT APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE DATED 08-04-2024 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO. 100508/2024 AND GRANT RELIEF AS PRAYED FOR BY THE APPELLANTS IN THIS APPEAL. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11488-DB WA No. 100214 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) Learned counsel for the appellants seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the appeal. In view of the said prayer, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 2. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending I.A’s, if any, do not survive for consideration. Sd/- (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) JUDGE RKM /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2